On
November 26, 2010, we reported that a good source told us the govt would not follow through on their promise to standardize mortgage penalties until this spring, at the earliest.
On December 15, 2010, we also reported that discounted Fixed mortgage rates were going up but Posted mortgage rates were staying the same… we stated that your mortgage penalty would not decrease as it normally does when rates go up.
We received some inquires about this article. Questions like ‘ shouldn’t my penalty go down if rates are going up?’ and ‘how could a mortgage penalty be more expensive if the Bank’s didn’t increase their posted rate?’
Okay, here’s my shocker statements…. A $200,000 mortgage taken in December 2008 will cost you
$16,800
to get out of today…. but 12 years ago it would have cost you approximately
$8,340
and even today, it should only cost $11,640. Got your attention? Please read the entire report to better understand.
WE TOOK THE MYSTERY OUT OF HOW THE PENALTIES ARE CALCULATED
We decided this needed a more detailed explanation….but a strange thing happened when we started to answer these questions… We made a startling discovery….we caution you, the results could get your blood boiling if you had to pay a penalty in the past 2 years….We found that Banks have shrunk or reduced the spreads between their Posted and Discounted rates over the past few years….and this has had a huge impact on Interest Rate Differential (IRD) penalty calculations. I’ll explain what this means in more detail further in this article.
(hey, quick facts… most popular mortgage product is a 5 yr fixed.. most profitable is a 5 yr fixed… on average, a mortgage if refinanced or someone moves every 3 years… mortgage penalties affect more people than you think)
FIRST, YOU NEED TO UNDERSTAND THE HISTORY OF MORTGAGE PENALTIES
To better explain the above statements, I need to explain why mortgage penalties exist at all. To do this we need to go back in time… in the 1990′s, mortgage penalties were capped at 3 months interest (for all CMHC insured mortgages)…This was a policy that CMHC had implemented. Most banks just used that same formula for non-cmhc insured mortgages….some Banks still had an IRD penalty clause in their standard charge terms but the formula for calculating this was very different from today.
Back then, a few things were different… Discounted rates on 5 year terms were only 0.50% to 0.75% off Bank Posted rates… if you had 3 years remaining in your 5 year term, the banker went to the rate sheet, looked at their 3 year POSTED fixed rate and if your rate was higher, then they calculated the IRD (usually, a nominal amount because the banker only had posted rates to compare with). If your rate was lower, then the banker could impose a 3 month interest penalty or NO PENALTY.. that’s right, no penalty. It was up to the banker’s discretion. (Mr. Potter wasn’t that happy back then…but things were about to change)
But I’m getting ahead of myself. The reason or justification for having an IRD penalty in the first place is to compensate the Bank for any loss that they may incur when re-lending the funds…
HERE’S A DIRECT QUOTE FROM THE TD CANADA TRUST WEBSITE:
“The IRD amount is calculated on the amount being prepaid using an interest rate equal to the difference between your existing mortgage interest rate and the interest rate that we can now charge when re-lending the funds for the remaining term of the mortgage.”
Did anybody get that? The IRD penalty is there to compensate the Bank for any loss due to a mortgage being paid out and then to have to lend funds out again for the remaining term at a rate that is less than what they had in the contract… I don’t think anyone would have a problem with that. After all, it is a business and they can’t be expected to take a loss. But somewhere along the line, this reason got lost or forgotten. The current IRD penalty calculation is OVER-CHARGINGborrowers. And the Bank’s have shrunk their spread between posted and discounted rates causing borrowers to pay record mortgage penalties in the $10k, $15k and $20k range and higher! (scroll to the top to see if Mr. Potter is smiling)
Let’s fast forward to the end of 1999. CMHC quietly removed the 3 month interest penalty cap from their policy…probably because of competition from Genworth Financial Mortgage Insurance (formerly GE Mortgage Insurance and a competitor to CMHC). Banks slowly changed their own policies to allow for IRD to be charged.. and today we have Bank’s using an unfair penalty calculation that does more than cover any potential loss.. it makes the borrower pay an unfair amount..
MORTGAGE PENALTY CALCULATIONS TODAY
Let’s look at the numbers.. Let’s use a $200,000 mortgage that was taken out in December 2008 at 5.54% for a 5 year fixed term… The Posted rate was 6.95% giving us a discount of 1.41% off the 5 year fixed rate. Today’s 3 year posted rate is 4.15%. (we’re using TD Canada Trust in this example because they have a clear explanation and formula on prepayment penalties on their website…but this formula is similar to what the other Big Six banks are using.)
Using the IRD formula from their website the penalty would be approximately $16,800. That’s equal to 18 months of interest!! Here’s what’s happening. The Banks are using your original discount given at the time of the mortgage. They take that discount, in this case, 1.41%, and subtract that from their posted 3 year fixed rated (4.15% – 1.41% = 2.74%). The problem is that NONE of the Big Six Banks are advertising a 1.41% discount off their 3 year rate… The best advertised rate that we could find with TD Canada Trust is through their Broker channel. That rate is 3.60%. So why are they using 2.74% to calculate your IRD penalty?
But what’s more disturbing is that this formula has gone unchecked by Govt’s, regulators and watchdogs for almost a decade. Wait, it gets worse… we all know that mortgage rates have been at record lows for the past 18 months. This alone would cost borrowers even more to get out of their mortgage. The Banks don’t seem content with that… They have shrunk their spread on shorter term mortgages making these penalties higher than ever… (I can almost hear Mr. Potter laughing)
In 2007, TD had a posted 3 year fixed rate of 7.35% and a discounted rate of 6.05%…that’s a 1.30% discount. Today, the posted 3 year rate is 4.15% and the discounted rate is 3.60%…. a discount of just 0.55%. That reduced posted rate is costing borrowers dearly. And to put this in a better context, if the posted 3 year fixed rate was 1.30% higher than the discounted rate today, then the penalty would be approximately $11,640 instead of $16,800 . (as an aside, if this was 1998, your penalty would cost $8,340 because the Bank only used the Posted Rated when calculating the penalty.)
End result is HIGHER MORTGAGE PENALTIES for borrowers, MORE PROFIT FOR BANKS.
We need to get more attention on this subject. These penalties are unfair, unjust and the logic isn’t adding up to the original reason for having mortgage penalties to begin with. Hoping this article explains the HOW penalties are calculated…. I’ll let you figure out the WHY they are calculated this way… I think it’s quite obvious who is winning and who is losing. (what’s that saying? The House Always Wins.)
